Executive protection

Coverage

Threat patterns programs typically monitor

Programs are tuned to your marks and channels; the list below reflects common categories teams prioritize.

• Clone profiles of leadership and finance

  Impostor accounts using approved imagery and bios to pressure employees, suppliers, or investors.

• Scam DMs and engagement-baited lures

  Direct-message funnels, fake AMAs, and giveaway scams that route victims off-platform to credential or wallet drains.

• Deepfake voice and video impersonation

  Synthetic media used in fake recruiter outreach, investor briefings, or internal-communications fraud.

• Coordinated impersonation networks

  Linked profile clusters operated by the same actor across platforms — clustered for one takedown narrative.

• Cross-channel chains (social → web → wallet)

  How a clone profile points to a lookalike domain points to a payment scam — tracked as one case, not three tickets.

• Comms trees and escalation tabletops

  Pre-agreed communications language, legal review hooks, and platform-specific reporting paths ready before incidents.

Designed for credibility and confidentiality

Executive programs fail when leaders learn to ignore alerts, or when sensitive details leak through the wrong channel. Structure watchlists, severity, and comms upfront.

High-confidence signals, smaller queues

Tune similarity and channel rules around approved public identifiers and imagery. The objective is fewer tickets with higher precision, not every mention of an executive name.

Takedowns with aligned stakeholders

Legal, communications, and EA teams need different detail levels on the same case. Track platform submissions and follow-ups while keeping external messaging disciplined.

FAQs

Common questions